Some Rough Slush Statistics...
So for fun today (I have a weird idea of fun), I decided to go through the last 250 pieces in my slush pile from March/April.
Different publishers get different stuff in slush, so I'm not saying this is going to be the same results across the board...BUT it should give you a good sense of what I end up seeing.
What I was looking at, specifically, is how many submissions followed our basic guidelines. We aren't, really, all that strict. Email cover letter with your contact info, book titles/genre/word count, book blurb/jacket copy, and synopsis in the body of the email. Complete novel attached in RTF (no other attachments). For formatting: use a common font (like Times New Roman), italics rather than underlines for italicized text, *** for scene breaks...now, the current guidelines ask for single spaced, but I hate reading things that way, so it'll be changed to 1.5 for the next round. No bold. We take sci-fi, fantasy, horror, paranormal, and mysteries. All this is clearly laid out.
For the purposes of this sampling, I didn't bother worrying about whether any text was bold, or little things like that--just basic, simple guidelines. Did you include the info we need in your cover letter? Did you attach in the right format?
I broke down the stats a little from there into other details. So...here you go!
131 followed the basic guidelines.
119 didn't (so they got at least one major thing wrong).
***
Of that 131, only 40 had an actual cover letter.
Now, basically, I don't particularly care if you write a cover letter or not--I've contracted really good books that only sent me the basic information I required. But I just thought it was worth mentioning. For 91 of them, there were no previous publishing credits listed, no real salutation. In some ways, this is a good thing--a lot of writers say really stupid things in their cover letters. Usually they talk about how their mom loved the book and they were published by Poetry.com and how they have several sequels in the works. None of those things makes me want to read any further, so sometimes it's best to say nothing, LOL. But a brief, well written cover letter goes a long way towards putting me in a good mood.
***
Of the 119 that didn't follow the guidelines...I stupidly didn't think to count how many didn't have a synopsis, but I'd say at least half. That's the biggest thing people don't do. Either that, or they send it as an attachment
6 didn't include a full manuscript--instead, they sent three chapters or a couple of short stories from their long anthology.
33 attached the wrong format. We ask for RTF. It's not hard to do an RTF. Some did doc, others docx, a few were PDF, one was zip, and still another was an "unknown" file type that had no extension, although the author typed "RTF" at the end of the file name.
4 had the manuscript in the body of the email.
8 had no manuscript included at all.
23 were genres we don't accept.
***
Now, a couple of other stats that don't really fit into either category, but are interesting to note.
16 had no title or author on the first page (or header) of their file. Though this isn't in our guidelines, it's kinda common sense. Why wouldn't you put your book title there?
3 had weird file titles. One was Mundania.rft, and two others were manuscript.rtf. Uh...hey, kids, stuff can get lost. Pick a normal file name. Many others were the initials of the titles, which can be confusing but not as bad as those three.
26 addressed their cover letters to me. This isn't a huge deal--I haven't been here that long, so I don't care if they're not personalized. What's also interesting is that around half of that 26 were ones that didn't follow the other guidelines. So...they looked me up, but not the submissions page?
Another 2 were addressed to people who don't work at the company, and haven't for several years (if they ever did).
3 others were addressed to completely different publishers. Someone clearly had a standard cover letter, and didn't bother fixing it.
***
Other highlights (I'm paraphrasing lines here):
"I hope the novel isn't too poorly written."
"Dear Mundania Press: I would like to submit my book __Title__ to __Publisher that's not MP__"
"Please send me a critique when you're done reading."
"Here's my life history of sexual abuse..."
"Thank you for telling me I didn't follow the guidelines. Here is my manuscript again." (Hasn't followed guidelines.)








Comments
#1 Bless your heart! I hope
Bless your heart! I hope there's at least one worthy, and I feel much better about my chances of getting published now.
Julie Butcher
http://jrbutcher.blogspot.com
#2 LOL Julie--there were a
LOL Julie--there were a couple that did grab me and I'm looking forward to getting back to them. ;-)
I know a lot of people have found that slush stories boast their confidence when submitting. Clearly, following the guidelines immediately puts people in the top fifty percent. On top of that, if you write well, you're golden. ;-) It then comes down to publisher's needs and editorial preferences.
----
"She wrapped evil around her like a large, evil Mexican serape."
#3 Man, you weren't kidding when
Man, you weren't kidding when you said that you filtered out the worst of it before you send the partials, were you? I still can't believe people say stuff like that. Especially the first one on your list of "Other Highlights". At least that's not as arrogant as people saying they've just written the next Harry Potter. :)
~ Shayne
#4 And it probably bears
And it probably bears mentioning that we also, pretty explicitly, ask for well written books and entertaining stories in our guidelines...though a little of that is subjective, I'd knock out a whole lot of other ones from the "followed guidelines" category if I'd only counted the ones that were good. ;-)
----
"She wrapped evil around her like a large, evil Mexican serape."
#5 Surprised
Skyla:
Wow! I am surprised by the statistics and I have to admit while reading them, I became a little nervous wondering if I did something particularly strange with my submission. Lots of drama in this post...☺
Thanks for taking the time to tally up everything. It is interesting!
Have a good weekend.
Take care,
Nora Weston
www.noraweston.com
#6 FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES
You are weally weally scarwing me.
Val Faulkner
#7 Its because of Skyla's tips,
Its because of Skyla's tips, rants, raves and sometimes drunken chat that I have learned so many things not to do. If and when im ready to submit a story I hope it will make it through the slush. If it does I will atribute it to what I have learned here. ( And hopefully a little writing skill thrown in for good measure.)
Jamie
#8 What not to do is really only
What not to do is really only half of it--writing skill and marketability is equally important. ;-) I think (hope) most people assume that good writing is critical. But I run into a lot of people who think that, if the writing is good enough, an editor will overlook little things like not following the guidelines...which is why I always rant about it, LOL.
----
"She wrapped evil around her like a large, evil Mexican serape."